This archived comparison may not reflect current pricing or service limits. Confirm important details on each provider’s official website.
TinyPNG has been the go-to image compressor for years. It uses smart lossy compression to reduce PNG and JPEG file sizes. But it uploads your files to their servers and has daily limits on the free tier.
EaziApps Image Compress uses browser-based codecs. Selected files are processed in the current browser session rather than sent to an EaziApps image-processing server.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | EaziApps | TinyPNG |
|---|---|---|
| Processing | Browser-based (local) | Server-side upload |
| Privacy | Processed in browser | Files uploaded to server |
| Daily limit (free) | Unlimited | 20 images/day |
| Max file size | Depends on browser memory | 5 MB per image |
| Formats | JPG, PNG, WebP | JPG, PNG, WebP |
| Quality control | Adjustable slider (1-100%) | Automatic only |
| Batch processing | Yes, unlimited | Up to 20 at once |
| Account required | No | No (free tier) |
| API access | No | Yes (paid) |
| WordPress plugin | No | Yes |
When to Use EaziApps
- You need to compress confidential images that shouldn't be uploaded
- You want unlimited compression without daily caps
- You need manual quality control (e.g., quality 60% for thumbnails, 90% for portfolio)
- You're on a slow or metered connection and prefer local processing
When to Use TinyPNG
- You need an API for automated workflows or CI/CD pipelines
- You use the WordPress plugin for automatic optimization on upload
- You prefer fully automatic quality decisions (no slider to adjust)
Verdict
For everyday image compression, EaziApps gives you more control, no daily limits, and better privacy. TinyPNG's advantage is its API and WordPress integration for automated workflows. If you're manually compressing images, there's no reason to upload them to a server when browser-based compression produces equivalent results.
Try the tools yourself: